Diagenetic evolution of onshore Campanian Sandstone, Ariyalur-Cauvery Basin

Authors

  • R Nagendra Anna University, Chennai

Keywords:

Diagenesis, Sillakkudi, Sandstone

Abstract

The onshore Campanian (Sillakkudi Fm.) sandstone is sub-angular to angular sorted grains of quartz (97%), feldspar (2.5%) and lithic fragments (0.5%) of continental block provenance derived by the rapid rate of erosion under hot and humid climate. The fabric signifies the free-floating (33%), point contact (46%), long contact (17%), suture contact (2.5%) and concavo-convex contact (1.5%). The relatively high percentage of free-floating grains and point contact cemented by calcite cement, suggesting the early cementation process and diminutive compaction. Whereas the 63% of point and long contact and 4% of the suture and concavo-convex contact symptomatic of the early calcite cementation and mechanical compaction in excess of the chemical compaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ayyasami, K. (2006). Role of oysters in biostratigraphy: A case study from the Cretaceous of the Ariyalur area, southern India. Geoscience Journal, 10(3), 237-247.
2. Banerji, R.K. (1979). On the occurrence of Tertiary algal reefs in the Cauvery basin and their stratigraphic relationship. Geological Survey of India Misc. Publications, 45, 181-196.
3. Blanford, H.F. (1862). Cretaceous and other rocks of South-Arcot and Trichinopoly districts, Madras, Memoir of Geological Survey of India, 4(1), 2172.
4. Bakkiaraj, D., Nagendra, R., Nagarajan, R., and Armstrong, J.A. (2010). Geochemistry of Sandstones from the Upper Cretaceous Sillakkudi Formation, Cauvery Basin, Southern India: Implication for Provenance Journal of Geological Society of India, 76, 453-467.
5. Burely, S.D., Kentorowicz, J.D. and Waugh, B. (1985). Clastic diagenesis, sedimentology, recent development of applied aspects, Blackwell, Oxford, 18,189-226.
6. Chilingar, G.V., Bissel. (1983). Compositional diagenesis In: Parker, A, and Sellwood, B.W. (Eds.). Sediment diagenesis, D. Reidal, Dordrecht, 57-167.
7. Govindan A, Ravindran, C.N, & Rangaraju M.K. (1996). Cretaceous stratigraphy and planktonic foraminiferal zonation of Cauvery Basin, south India, Memoir of Geological Society of India, 37, 155-187.
8. Lundegard, P.D. (1992). Sandstone porosity loss; a big picture view of the importance of compaction. Journal of sedimentary petrology, 62, 250-260.
9. Madhavaraju, J and Lee, Y. I. (2009). Geochemistry of the Dalmiapuram Formation of the Uttatur Group, early Cretaceous, Cauvery Basin, southeastern India, Proceedings of the Implications on provenance and paleo-redox conditions. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 26, 380-394.
10. Madhavaraju, J. and Ramasamy, S. (1999a). Rare earth elements in limestones of Kallankurichchi Formation of Ariyalur Group, Tiruchirappalli Cretaceous, Tamil Nadu. Journal of Geological Society of India, 54, 291-301.
11. Madhavaraju, J. and Ramasamy, S. (1999b) Micro-textures on quartz grains of Campanian – Maastrichtian sediments of Ariyalur Group of Tiruchirappalli Cretaceous, Tamil Nadu – Implication on depositional environments. Journal of Geological Society of India, 54, 647-658.
12. Madhavaraju, J. and Ramasamy, S. (2001) Clay mineral assemblages and rare earth element distribution in the sediments of Ariyalur Group, Tiruchirappalli District, Tamil Nadu –Implication for paleoclimate. Journal of Geological Society of India, 58, 69-77.
13. Madhavaraju, J., Ramasamy, S., Ruffell. A and Mohan, S.P. (2002). Clay mineralogy of the late Cretaceous and early Tertiary successions of the Cauvery Basin (southeastern India): Implications for sediment source and palaeoclimates at the K/ T boundary. Cretaceous Research, 23, 153-163.
14. Morad, S., Ketzer, J.M. and De Ros, L.F. (2000). Spatial and temporal distribution of diagenetic alteration in siliciclastic rocks: implications for mass transfer in sedimentary basins. Sedimentology, 47, 95-120.
15. Nagendra, R, Kamalakkannan, B.V, GargiSen, Harry Gilbert, Bakkiaraj, D, Nallapa Reddy, A and Jaiprakash, B.C. (2011). Sequence surfaces and paleobathymetric trends in Albian to Maastrichtian sediments of Ariyalur area, Cauvery Basin, India. Journal of Marine and Petroleum Geology, 28, 895-905.
16. Nagendra, R, Sarvanan, N, Kamalakkannan, B.V, & GargiSen. (2003). Petrophysical characterization of sandstone of Sillakkudi Formation, Ariyalur Group, Tamil Nadu Indian Journal of Petroleum Geology, 10, 49-52.
17. Nagendra, R., and Reddy, A.N. (2017) Major geologic events of the Cauvery Basin, India and their correlation with global signatures-A Review Journal of Paleogeography, 69 (1), 69-83.
18. Prabhakar, K.N and Zutshi, P.L. (1993). Evolution of Southern part of Indian East Coast Basins, Journal of Geological Society of India, 41, 215-230.
19. Ramanathan, S. (1979) Tertiary formations of south India. Geological. Survey of India Miscellaneous Publication, 45,165-180.
20. Ramasamy, S and Banerji, R.K. (1991). Geology, petrography and systematic stratigraphy of the pre-Ariyalur sequence in Tiruchirappalli district, Tamil Nadu, India, Journal of Geological Society of India, 37, 577-594.
21. Ramasamy, S and Banerji, R.K. (1991). Geology, petrography and systematic stratigraphy of the pre-Ariyalur sequence in Tiruchirappalli district, Tamil Nadu, India, Journal of Geological Society of India, 37, 577-594.
22. Rangaraju, M.K., Agarwal, A., and Prabhakar, K.N. (1993).Tectonostratigraphy, structural style, evolutionary model and hydrocarbon prospects of the Cauvery and Palar Basins of India, Indian, Petroleum publishers, Dehra Dun, 1, 371-398.
23. Sundaram, R and Rao, P.S. (1986). Lithostratigraphy of Cretaceous and Paleocene rocks of Tiruchirappalli district, Tamil Nadu. Records of Geological Survey of India, 115, 9-23.
24. Van der Plas, L. and Tobi, A.C. (1965). A chart for judging the reliability of point counting results. American Journal of Science, 263, 87-90.

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

Nagendra, R. (2018). Diagenetic evolution of onshore Campanian Sandstone, Ariyalur-Cauvery Basin. Journal of The Indian Association of Sedimentologists (peer Reviewed), 35(2), 50–58. Retrieved from http://journal.indiansedimentologists.com/ojs/index.php/1/article/view/26
Share |